With these prophetic words, I present my new, updated answer to the age-old question: which battleship was the best one out there?
That's a really good question. For the purposes of this discussion, we're going to actually award not one, but four prizes:
HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION
MIDDLEWEIGHT CHAMPION
BEST ALL-AROUND SHIP, and
BEST ALL-AROUND TREATY BATTLESHIP
MIDDLEWEIGHT CHAMPION is pretty much the same, except that it goes to a battleship which at least pretended to pay lip service to the provisions of the Washington and London Naval Treaties.
BEST ALL-AROUND BATTLESHIP gets awarded to the battleship which has the best blend of speed, firepower, armor, secondary and anti-aircraft armament, fire-control, and the whole ball of wax.
BEST ALL-AROUND TREATY BATTLESHIP is awarded to the best all-around vessel which roughly conforms to the naval treaties cited above. This rules out Yamato and Iowa.
A tabular layout of the scoring categories is given below:
Heavyweight Champion | Middlweight Champion | Best All-Around Battleship | Best All-Around Treaty Battleship |
---|---|---|---|
Guns Armor Underwater Protection Fire-Control Tactical Factors |
Guns Armor Underwater Protection Fire-Control Tactical Factors |
Guns Armor Underwater Protection Fire-Control Tactical Factors Secondary Armament: Anti-ship Total Anti-Aircraft Suite Operational Factors |
Guns Armor Underwater Protection Fire-Control Tactical Factors Secondary Armament: Anti-ship Total Anti-Aircraft Suite Operational Factors |
It should be noted right off the bat that just because one ship or another ends up being proclaimed 'Best Whatever' doesn't necessarily mean that it would always win a fight against a lower rated ship. See the scoring system page for a more detailed discussion of this question.
Anyway, we'll start with an examination of three vital areas: who's got the most powerful guns, the best designed protective armor scheme, and the most accurate fire control. First, though, we have to introduce...
As some of you may recall, the first edition of this page featured a three-way race between Bismarck, Yamato and Iowa. I received quite a volume of e-mail from overseas (including some from Germany, surprise, surprise...) debating various points of contention. And I have to admit, I learned a ton in the process. So I figure, hey, why stop there? Why not try and foment an 'International Incident' with every possible member of the European Community? And so, armed with new reference books, back-issues of Warship International, and unpublished source works, I proceed to stick my neck way out by introducing three more players to the game: Richelieu, King George V, Vittorio Veneto, and South Dakota! If this doesn't keep my e-mail In-Box full, nothing will!
Main Armament | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7.5 | 8.5 |
Armor | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating | 10 | 9.5 | 6.5 | 9 | 8.5 | 7 | 9.5 |
Underwater Protection | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating | 9 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
Fire Control | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating | 5 | 10 | 5 | 7.5 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
Tactical Factors | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating | 9.5 | 10 | 9 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
All right, it's time to add up the points and see who comes out on top for both the Heavy and Middleweight categories. Judges, your scorecards please...
Score: 148 |
Score: 166 |
Score: 121 |
Score: 147.5 |
Score: 131.5 |
Score: 117.5 |
Score: 155.5 |
Score: 121 |
Score: 147.5 |
Score: 131.5 |
Score: 117.5 |
Score: 155.5 |
GENERAL COMMENTS: In the battle of the heavyweights, Iowa edges Yamato, largely because of her awesome fire-control. SoDak, Yamato and Richelieu are practically in a dead heat, which is surprising on the face of it, until South Dakota's and Richelieu's very respectable fire control, and excellent protection is considered. In the Middleweight category, South Dakota comes out as the winner, though Richelieu is also a very strong contender, and has some slight advantages in terms of speed and underwater protection. She is clearly superior to either of her likely Axis antagonists, both of whom suffered from inadequate protection, and inferior fire-control (at least during the latter half of the war).
All right, then, now that we have the Heavy- and Middleweight Champion prizes awarded, let's take a look at the other categories that go into the Best All-Around competition.
Secondary Batteries | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating: Anti-Ship | 9.5 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
Overall Rating: Anti-Aircraft | 4.5 | 10 | 4 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 1 | 10 |
Light Anti-aircraft | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating | 2.5 | 10 | 3.5 | 7 | 8 | 1.5 | 10 |
Total Anti-aircraft suite | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating | 3 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 10 |
Operational Factors | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating | 8 | 10 | 8.5 | 9 | 5.5 | 7.5 | 9 |
And now the moment we'e all been waiting for. Again, judges; your scorecards...
Score: 170 |
Score: 206 |
Score: 146 |
Score: 174 |
Score: 152 |
Score: 130.5 |
Score: 196 |
GENERAL COMMENTS: Not surprisingly, Iowa is the winner in the Best All-Around competition. American secondaries and AAA were awesomely effective. The Axis ships, particularly Vittorio Veneto, were horribly outclassed in this department. In the Middleweight category, South Dakota comes out on top again, followed again (though more distantly this time) by Richelieu.
Well, that sort of wraps it up. A very complex topic, all in all, and one which is impossible to answer conclusively. After all, as in all things having to do with combat, luck would have more than a little to do with determining the outcome in a clash between any of these steel monsters. And yet, it is certainly true that certain of these vessels were better equipped to operate in the combat environment of World War II. I hope this study has brought out some of the strengths and weaknesses of these magnificent vessels.